Image Source wikimedia
On April 22, 2025, a devastating terrorist attack occurred in the tranquil Baisaran Valley near Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, resulting in the deaths of 26 individuals, comprising 25 Indian tourists and one Nepali national. This incident stands as one of the most lethal civilian massacres in the area since the 2019 Pulwama attack. The assault, carried out by five to six heavily armed terrorists, has reverberated throughout India, rekindling concerns over rising tensions with Pakistan and prompting discussions regarding the possibility of an Indo-Pak war.
The Assault: A Vicious Attack on Innocence
This tragic incident unfolded in the beautiful Baisaran meadow, often referred to as ‘Mini Switzerland,’ situated about 5 kilometers from Pahalgam. A group of tourists, captivated by the valley’s stunning scenery accessible only on foot or horseback, found themselves under a sudden barrage of gunfire. The Resistance Front (TRF), linked to the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), has claimed responsibility for this heinous act, although Indian authorities have yet to provide official confirmation.
Initial investigations reveal that at least five terrorists were involved, including three Pakistani nationals known as Asif Fauji (alias Moosa), Suleman Shah (alias Yunus), and Abu Talha (alias Asif). Additionally, two Kashmiris, Adil Guri and Ahsan, who are believed to have received training in Pakistan, were also implicated. Reports indicate that the attackers specifically targeted Hindu tourists, with one account suggesting they spared a professor from Assam after he recited the Islamic declaration of faith, the Kalima.
The savagery of the assault has drawn comparisons from former US Pentagon official Michael Rubin to the October 7, 2023, Hamas attacks in Israel, prompting widespread outrage. Prime Minister Narendra Modi condemned the act as a ‘crime against humanity,’ pledging a ‘strong and measured response.’ Global leaders, including US President Donald Trump and French Minister Francois-Noel Buffet, have voiced their support for India, denouncing the attack as an abhorrent act of terrorism.
India’s Strategic and Diplomatic Countermeasures
In retaliation, India has implemented a range of punitive actions against Pakistan, which it blames for supporting cross-border terrorism. On April 23, the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS), led by PM Modi, revealed five major initiatives:
- Indus Waters Treaty Suspension: For the first time since its establishment in 1960, India has placed the treaty governing the Indus River system on hold until Pakistan takes ‘credible and irrevocable’ measures to cease its support for terrorism. Although this action may seem symbolic in the short term due to India’s limited capacity to redirect water, it represents a significant long-term strategic advantage.
- Closure of the Attari-Wagah Border: The Integrated Check Post at Attari has been immediately closed, halting cross-border trade and movement.
- Expulsion of Pakistani Diplomats: Pakistani military, naval, and air advisors in New Delhi have been declared unwelcome and must leave within a week. India has also recalled its military attachés from Islamabad and reduced the number of personnel in both countries’ high commissions from 55 to 30 by May 1.
- Ban on Pakistani Nationals: Pakistani citizens benefiting from the SAARC Visa Exemption Scheme have been instructed to exit India within 48 hours.
- Security Crackdown: Home Minister Amit Shah has committed to ramping up counter-terrorism efforts in Kashmir, with security forces actively searching the forests around Pahalgam for the attackers. A reward of Rs 20 lakh has been offered for information leading to the capture of each suspect.
Pakistan’s Response: Denial and Deflection
Pakistan has strongly denied any involvement, with Defence Minister Khawaja Asif describing the attack as a ‘home-grown uprising’ against India’s ‘Hindutva regime.’ Pakistani officials, including Foreign Ministry spokesperson Shafqat Ali Khan, have expressed condolences but characterized the violence as stemming from internal turmoil in Kashmir. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has convened a National Security Committee meeting to address the situation.
Speculation on social media platforms like X points to possible involvement of the Pakistani military, with some suggesting that the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) may have orchestrated the attack to enhance the Pakistan Army’s image domestically amid ongoing unrest. However, these allegations are not substantiated and should be approached with skepticism.
Is an Indo-Pak War on the Horizon?
The recent attack in Pahalgam has reignited concerns about a potential larger conflict between the two nuclear-armed nations, which have engaged in three wars over Kashmir since 1947. Foreign policy expert Michael Kugelman highlighted that the significant number of casualties and the targeting of civilians could lead to a military response from India if it confirms Pakistan’s involvement. Previous incidents, like the 2016 Uri attack and the 2019 Pulwama bombing, resulted in Indian surgical strikes and airstrikes on Pakistani soil, respectively.
Nevertheless, several elements suggest that a full-scale war is improbable. India appears to be prioritizing diplomatic and economic measures over immediate military action, indicating a strategy of containment. Additionally, Pakistan’s economic vulnerabilities and internal political challenges make it less likely to escalate tensions. Both countries, cognizant of their nuclear arsenals, have historically refrained from engaging in total war, despite regular clashes along the Line of Control (LoC).
Moreover, the suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty adds a new layer to the conflict, potentially impacting Pakistan’s agriculture-dependent economy in the long run. Any missteps, such as a provocative reaction from Pakistan or further attacks, could heighten tensions. The international community, including nations like the US and France, has called for restraint while denouncing terrorism, indicating a collective interest in averting a descent into conflict.
(Newsroom staff only edited this story for style from a syndicated feed)
